![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Engine regs swapping engines
I'm still debating on whether to drop from modprod(3b) to roadgoing(1b) next year but I think the question applies to both classes:
Does the following.. "The engine block must be externally identifiable as that fitted to the original model or specified option" Mean I could swap my Saxo VTR 1.6 8v engine with a 1.6 16v engine from the VTS model.. I'm guessing that specific model refers to the Saxo rather than VTR,VTS etc.. Any help appreciated. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
However, I suspect the intention is the exact model. The argument goes that the "VTR-GTI-superfast-cosworth" model was fitted with a more powerful engine than the "ECO" model, it would also have come as standard with upgraded brakes, suspension etc. Just swapping a more powerful engine into a lower spec model could result in an unsafe car. This certainly is the view that car insurers take and no doubt also the insurers of the MSA.
__________________
Multiple Speed Champion |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ahh that makes sense, many thanks.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm afraid I don't agree with SportsLibre on this. The model is, by any normal definition, 'Saxo'. Check your MOT certificate or V5 for confirmation of this.
I would say that VTR/VTS/Furio/Desire etc are all different variants of the Saxo model and so you can fit any Saxo engine in any Saxo variant and still comply with the blue book. In any case, are the Saxo VTR/VTS blocks (TU5) not the same anyway and its just the head that is different? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
As I said. My view will be a small minority and unless someone asks the specific question to the MSA it will probably remain so. Despite the obvious insurance based logic.
It suits most people to read it in that way as they have already modified their base model with performance parts that weren't on it when produced. The operative word is that it is a "production" class not a "road" category. Fell free to ignore me as no-one will protest, as they will nearly all have done the same thing.
__________________
Multiple Speed Champion |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
He was stopped stationary - James Hunt |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
given that blocks like the ford pinto and xflow have been made and bolted into all and sundry on fords production line for generations it seems, i cant see how its even possible to prove what year, let alone era they come from. I suppose you could check engine serial numbers but scrutineering would take until wednesday morning!
I think a sensible view should be taken, and i suspect in reality is already, by the scrutes. A zetec in a escort mk2 is taking the michael, but a 3 year newer pinto than was bolted in from Dagenham seems acceptable to me. apologies to OP, not up on Pug/Citroen motors, but same theory would apply. are BMC A series and A+ visually the same by the way? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
A+ has some external extra bracing on the block, like a criss cross of little webs somewhere but I can't remember where.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The chap with the £6500 Crossflow powered mk1 Escort on Sunday, was quite tempted when I suggested he sell it and stick a 2.0 Duratec in the engine bay, and join me in Sports Libre. He spent most of the event worrying about oil pressures and water temps.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
very early A series had 'windows' in the side of the block where the tappets are. Pinto have 2 0 or 201 cast into the block and they are known to have been modified with an angle grinder. FF 2000 are now allowed to use the later 201 blocks because of the shortage of the 2 0 blocks...
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|